With rater data, rating scales can help achieve this kind of objectivity. Both are subjective types of data, but the major advantage of self-report data is that it is objective in the sense that all respondents react to the same stimuli. Particularly, distortions of reality can be peculiar to both kinds of data ( Cattell, 1965). Both methods rely on self-disclosure, and both are subject to distortions ( Cronbach, 1984). Spitzberg ( 1986a, 1986b) calls these "self-reference" and "other-reference" instruments. Self-report and rater-data approaches have long been recognized as two basic methods of acquiring data in the behavioral sciences. However, the criterion measures, self-perceived leadership and other-perceived leadership, may represent variations of emergent leadership and both may be needed to more fully understand the leadership emergence phenomenon.Ī Convergent Validity Model of Emergent Leadership in Groups It can be concluded that the predictors of emergent leadership are similar under a variety of leadership measurement strategies. When using both self-report and other-report data, the correlates and patterns of prediction hold up for both types of data. Results indicated that the two measures are significantly related and have similar construct validities. The utilization of both self-perceived and other-perceived leadership measures introduced a convergent validation model into the research design. The study involved the use of two different methods of measuring emergent leadership: self-reference and other-reference. & Kenneth Wanberg, Ph.D.,Īrticle in "Small Group Research," Volume 22, Number 3, August 1991. "A Convergent Validity Model of Emergent Leadership in Groups"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |